{"id":45572,"date":"2022-10-25T21:48:56","date_gmt":"2022-10-25T19:48:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/meonline.hu\/?p=45572"},"modified":"2022-11-08T22:03:44","modified_gmt":"2022-11-08T21:03:44","slug":"antiszocialis-epitesz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/meonline.hu\/en\/utoirat\/antiszocialis-epitesz\/","title":{"rendered":"An (Anti)social Architect"},"content":{"rendered":"

On a Review of Aravena Titled A Half-Happy Architecture<\/strong><\/p>\n

Text: Bal\u00e1zs Rose<\/strong><\/p>\n

2016 was an exceptional year in Alejandro Aravena\u2019s life. Besides the Pritzker Prize, the architect from Chile has also been acting as the chief curator of the 15th Venetian Architectural Biennale. It is quite a unique achievement that within a year, he received two such excellent professional recognitions and attention from the media, which is quite rare even separately and individually. Reporting From the Front \u2013 this is the slogan of the Biennale, which directed the topic into the flow of \u201esocially dedicated\u201d. Now, that Aravena is aged 48, his first social housing estate, Quinta Monroy was built 13 years ago, and earned him international fame and thus has a past long enough to survey its impact on society.
\nProfessor Camillo Boano (University College of London), urbanist and critical theorist in co-operation with Francisco Vergara Perucich (Universidad de las Am\u00e9ricas, Santiago de Chile) surveyed with strict criticism the contradictory economic basis and results of Aravena\u2019s architecture, who, as they claim, misused and took advantage of the social topic. This article was published in issue No. 4 of Vicaversa online journal on architectural criticism in April, 2016.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\t